To aggregate or not to aggregate – there is no question – not

Article written By Bill Dadmun, Records and Receipts Manager; State of Virginia

How many of you use the aggregate function when reporting?  Does it make your life easier?  Listen to this scenario and tell me if it sounds familiar.

You get a call from someone that is due $49.95 from a credit balance.  You know based on the time frame that this account has already been reported to the state, so you refer them to the proper state, even providing them with the searchable website and how to submit a claim form.  You have done all of the right things only to get another call within the hour.  This time, the customer is mad, because the state says they cannot locate any property in their name, in particular not from your company.  “What is the problem with them!?!” You think to yourself.

You pick up the phone and call the state and find that because you have included the remittance and report data in the aggregate, it has not been listed in their database in such a way for their claims representatives to be able to locate it.  Not only that, but they say the only way they can pay the rightful owner is to first receive a letter from you stating details about the property and indicating which aggregate it was reported in.  Great, now you have to dig out that information all over again.  What a pain.

In the past, when a majority of the data reported by you and then entered into unclaimed property databases had to be handled by both of you in a manual data entry function, aggregating property not only made sense, it was absolutely necessary!  But today is different.  Most data today is handled within electronic files, where the data was already entered a long time ago.  You don't have to retype anything.  The reporting software used today is happy to import data from your files to create the NAUPA format text files that the states require.  The states are now very happy to have detail data, and you don't have to do any more work than you did before!  Just specify that the file to be created should supply detail information for all property owners.

Now, I am not saying you cannot aggregate.  If there are good reasons to do so, based on your company's circumstances, then by all means do so.  The law allows you to do so in most states.  But consider whether this is in your best interest long term.  The best possible scenario for you is to report it and forget it, right?  By reporting detail all the time, you are going a long way towards reaching that goal.

Danielle Herring

Product Manager, UPExchange

More Posts

3 replies
  1. c.ashing@fesagely.com'
    Cindy says:

    Danielle – Lord thank you for this lady and God bless her for all her hard work so I can set back and enjoy it.

    Aggregate – aggregating property does not make sense, it is to much work in the long run. I just list them and be done with it, worry free.

    Reply
  2. WANDA.KEPLAR@TUCSONAZ.GOV'
    WANDA KEPLAR says:

    Is there exceptions for reporting small dollar amounts? I have one item for Iowa for 2 cents. This does not make sense to do all the work for reporting this item. The cost for doing these types of amounts are way to much. I have 20 items under 1.00 that are between several states. Some states I will only have 1 to 3 items

    Reply
  3. Danielle Herring says:

    Thank you for the question, Wanda!

    Iowa does not have a ‘de minimus’ amount for reporting. This means that you do need to report an item even if the value is $.01.

    However, you are allowed by law to aggregate the records that are $50 and under. That means you could roll up all the records worth $49.99
    and under and report them as one lump sum rather than providing the detail for each.

    It is best to keep the detail on record somewhere so that you can easily retrieve the information if the state requests it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe